Wednesday, September 18, 2019
Critical Approaches to Literature Should Not be Required of English Majors :: Argumentative Persuasive Argument Essays
Critical Approaches to Literature Should Not be Required of English Majors         In the controversy that surrounds the issue     of requiring English majors to take Critical Approaches to     Literature, it is not important whether the course is academically     justifiable, but whether requiring English majors to take it is     justifiable.  By thinking about this issue in this way, I have     concluded that Critical Approaches to Literature should not be     required of English majors.         The main reason for including Critical Approaches to Literature as     a required course for English majors is to incorporate a sense of     multi-culturalism and feminism into the English major.  I would be     the first to agree that writers such as Toni Morrison, Langston     Hughes, Beth Bryant, and Sherman Alexie should be required reading     for all English majors at some point in their education because     these authors and their works do bring a dimension of multi-cultural     appreciation and feminist understanding to the student's literary     background.  However, the Critical Approaches to Literature class     that I attended did not teach me to appreciate the literature of     other cultures; instead, it taught me how to analyze Western     Literature as if I were a sociologist or psychologist.  In this     class, I began to feel that there was a hidden agenda imbedded     within the course's objectives.  This agenda was to destroy the     literature, which I am familiar with, of the culture I have grown     up in, and to force me to appreciate the literature of other     cultures along the way.  It did not work.         By saying, "It did not work," I do not mean that I have no     appreciation for the literature of cultures other than my own.  What     I do mean is that if I had not already possessed an appreciation for     Multi-cultural and Women's Literature, Critical Approaches to     Literature would not have conveyed this appreciation to me.  I firmly     believe that the poetry of Maurice Kenny is some of the most powerful     poetry that I have ever read, and Duan Niatum's love-poem "Round Dance"     is comparable to the best poetry that Western Literature has to offer.      These are authors I know and love not because I have taken Critical     Approaches to Literature, but because I have read these authors' works     in a Native American Literature course.            This is one reason why Critical Approaches to Literature should not be     					    
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.